GAO Decision Highlights Protest Timeliness for Postponed Pre-Award Debriefings (Competitive Range Exclusion)

April 24, 2019

GAO decision highlights protest timeliness for postponed pre-award debriefings (competitive range exclusion).


GAO's timeliness rules are strictly construed and provide that a protest following a "required" post-award debrief is timely if it's filed not later than 10 days after the debriefing. 4 CFR § 21.2(a)(2). Where an offeror is excluded from competitive range, a pre-award debriefing that is postponed until after award is "required" only when the "[excluded] offeror requested and was refused a pre-award debriefing.” 41 USC § 3705(c). Where the contractor elects to postpone, however, the debrief after the award is not "required."


Here, the protester initially requested a pre-award debriefing. But, in response to an agency inquiry, the protester then decided to postpone. As a result, the debrief after the award was not "required." Ultimately, GAO dismissed the protest as untimely because the protester would have learned the basis of its protest had it requested a pre-award debrief (failure to diligently pursue).


Takeaway: If you are excluded from competitive range, request a pre-award debriefing and take the first date offered. Do not postpone. If you do, you may lose the ability to protest.


GAO Decision: 



Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Contact Matross Edwards
Search By Tags
Please reload

  • Matross Edwards
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Podcast
  • Spotify
  • TuneIn

Copyright © 2020 Joshua B. Duvall. All rights reserved.

GovConJudicata™ #govconjudicata

CyberJudicata™ #cyberjudicata

LegalJudicata™ #legaljudicata